Individuals with proportionately higher amounts of harder calcified plaque best pridicted danger of heart attacks, while soft plaque did not,representing a potential paradigm shift, researchers said.
The study might be a “game changer” for figuring out who is at danger of a heart attack.
“It’s a malady marker, not a hazard marker. Also, we believe it’s conceivably a vital indicator,” said Brent Muhlestein from the Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute in Utah, US.
Atherosclerosis is brought about when plaque – a sticky store known to bring about cracks – develops in the supply routes, narrowing and solidifying them.
The idea that delicate plaque will probably break and cause heart attacks than hard calcium stores in coronary courses might not be right, as per the study that will be displayed at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions in Washington D.C.
“We already thought the lipid-laden soft plaque will probably break and cause heart attacks, however in light of our new research, it’s increasingly the calcified plaque that seems, by all accounts, to be related with unfavorable cardiovascular events,” Muhlestein included.